After months spent avoiding contact as much as possible, Europeans took to the streets this past weekend for Black Lives Matter protests in the wake of the death of George Floyd in the U.S.
And the numbers were big: 5,000 in Paris; 10,000 in Brussels; 15,000 in Berlin.
Scientists worry that the mass gatherings could result in a new surge in coronavirus cases.
“You dont have to be a virologist or an epidemiologist or a physician to understand why this is a risk in the current day and age when SARS-CoV-2 is still circulating,” said virologist Menno D. de Jong at the University of Amsterdam.
De Jong said people should be able to protest — but even demonstrators need to maintain social distancing.
“The danger of the corona pandemic has not been averted” — German MP Karl Lauterbach
“People need to be able to show their opposition to what has been happening in the United States and their solidarity with the affected individuals,” Paul Hunter, a professor at the University of East Anglia in the U.K., wrote in a statement. “But any mass gathering does pose a risk of increased transmission of COVID-19.”
Karl Lauterbach, a member of the German parliament for the center-left Social Democrats, tweeted a video of the demonstration in Berlin on Saturday and expressed concern that protesters werent keeping enough distance.
“The danger of the corona pandemic has not been averted,” wrote Lauterbach, a professor of health economics and epidemiology at the University of Cologne. “There were some super-spreader events outside too, in Italy and Spain. Racism must be fought, but without avoidable corona deaths.”
Another virologist, Belgiums Marc Van Ranst, put it simply: When it comes to coronavirus, these protests were “not a good idea.”
The protesters themselves seemed to be aware of the risks.
Carrie Xin Hou said safety was a “major consideration” that she and her partner weighed before deciding to attend the protest in Brussels Sunday. But the situation had improved dramatically from the height of the outbreak in March, she said, with the government announcing last week that bars and restaurants could reopen the day after the protest.
“If were going to go to something which requires taking a risk and going to a crowd … wed rather it be a protest than going to a bar,” Hou said.
The need to stand in solidarity with anti-racism protests in the U.S. is why, after considering the health risks, Bruna Campos also went to the protest in Brussels.
“Thats also the point: People showed up to a protest because of how dire the situation is,” Campos said.
Mitigating the risk
Paola Verhaert and a friend came prepared to the protest in Brussels — they brought extra face masks and hand gel to give out.
“To our delight, very few people were not wearing face masks and needed to receive one from us,” Verhaert said.
People gather on Champ de Mars in front of Eiffel Tower in Paris to protest in solidarity with the Black Lives Matter movement on June 6, 2020 | Geoffroy Van Der Hasselt/AFP via Getty Images
Verhaert and two other protesters told POLITICO that they were able to maintain distance from people they didnt know, and tried hard not to accidentally touch someone else.
There were also some factors working in protestors favor, said de Jong.
The protests were outdoors and wind and warm weather would likely have helped slow any spread of the virus. Even a large protest under these conditions would be better than a hundred or so people packing into a confined space like a bar, he added.
But hes concerned that face masks give people a false sense of security. If someone is infected and shouts, small droplets of spit can “traverse a self-made mask,” he noted.
The World Health Organization on Monday said protesters should maintain at least a 1-meter distance, wash their hands, cover their mouth if they cough, and wear a face mask.
Another key measure that has helped slow the infection has been staying apart — 1.5 or 2 meters depending on the country — from other people. That wasnt completely possible in the protests.
“There is clear evidence that banning mass gatherings was one of the most effective and important part of the lockdowns across European countries,” Keith Neal, an epidemiology professor at the University of Nottingham in the U.K., wrote in a press release. “Any mass gathering risks significant numbers of further cases.”
It “needs to be considered” that black, Asian and minority ethnic people are at a higher risk of COVID-19 complications, he added.
De Jong noted the organizers of the solidarity protest in Amsterdam marked spaces 1.5 meters apart for hundreds of people. But once thousands showed up, that was ineffective. These large numbers also mean contact tracing will be difficult if someone gets infected.
The exact effect of the protests across Europe is not certain, he said — that will emerge only in two to three weeks: “Thats why we need to be on guard.”
Sense of urgency
Having thousands Read More – Source
After months spent avoiding contact as much as possible, Europeans took to the streets this past weekend for Black Lives Matter protests in the wake of the death of George Floyd in the U.S.
And the numbers were big: 5,000 in Paris; 10,000 in Brussels; 15,000 in Berlin.
Scientists worry that the mass gatherings could result in a new surge in coronavirus cases.
“You dont have to be a virologist or an epidemiologist or a physician to understand why this is a risk in the current day and age when SARS-CoV-2 is still circulating,” said virologist Menno D. de Jong at the University of Amsterdam.
De Jong said people should be able to protest — but even demonstrators need to maintain social distancing.
“The danger of the corona pandemic has not been averted” — German MP Karl Lauterbach
“People need to be able to show their opposition to what has been happening in the United States and their solidarity with the affected individuals,” Paul Hunter, a professor at the University of East Anglia in the U.K., wrote in a statement. “But any mass gathering does pose a risk of increased transmission of COVID-19.”
Karl Lauterbach, a member of the German parliament for the center-left Social Democrats, tweeted a video of the demonstration in Berlin on Saturday and expressed concern that protesters werent keeping enough distance.
“The danger of the corona pandemic has not been averted,” wrote Lauterbach, a professor of health economics and epidemiology at the University of Cologne. “There were some super-spreader events outside too, in Italy and Spain. Racism must be fought, but without avoidable corona deaths.”
Another virologist, Belgiums Marc Van Ranst, put it simply: When it comes to coronavirus, these protests were “not a good idea.”
The protesters themselves seemed to be aware of the risks.
Carrie Xin Hou said safety was a “major consideration” that she and her partner weighed before deciding to attend the protest in Brussels Sunday. But the situation had improved dramatically from the height of the outbreak in March, she said, with the government announcing last week that bars and restaurants could reopen the day after the protest.
“If were going to go to something which requires taking a risk and going to a crowd … wed rather it be a protest than going to a bar,” Hou said.
The need to stand in solidarity with anti-racism protests in the U.S. is why, after considering the health risks, Bruna Campos also went to the protest in Brussels.
“Thats also the point: People showed up to a protest because of how dire the situation is,” Campos said.
Mitigating the risk
Paola Verhaert and a friend came prepared to the protest in Brussels — they brought extra face masks and hand gel to give out.
“To our delight, very few people were not wearing face masks and needed to receive one from us,” Verhaert said.
People gather on Champ de Mars in front of Eiffel Tower in Paris to protest in solidarity with the Black Lives Matter movement on June 6, 2020 | Geoffroy Van Der Hasselt/AFP via Getty Images
Verhaert and two other protesters told POLITICO that they were able to maintain distance from people they didnt know, and tried hard not to accidentally touch someone else.
There were also some factors working in protestors favor, said de Jong.
The protests were outdoors and wind and warm weather would likely have helped slow any spread of the virus. Even a large protest under these conditions would be better than a hundred or so people packing into a confined space like a bar, he added.
But hes concerned that face masks give people a false sense of security. If someone is infected and shouts, small droplets of spit can “traverse a self-made mask,” he noted.
The World Health Organization on Monday said protesters should maintain at least a 1-meter distance, wash their hands, cover their mouth if they cough, and wear a face mask.
Another key measure that has helped slow the infection has been staying apart — 1.5 or 2 meters depending on the country — from other people. That wasnt completely possible in the protests.
“There is clear evidence that banning mass gatherings was one of the most effective and important part of the lockdowns across European countries,” Keith Neal, an epidemiology professor at the University of Nottingham in the U.K., wrote in a press release. “Any mass gathering risks significant numbers of further cases.”
It “needs to be considered” that black, Asian and minority ethnic people are at a higher risk of COVID-19 complications, he added.
De Jong noted the organizers of the solidarity protest in Amsterdam marked spaces 1.5 meters apart for hundreds of people. But once thousands showed up, that was ineffective. These large numbers also mean contact tracing will be difficult if someone gets infected.
The exact effect of the protests across Europe is not certain, he said — that will emerge only in two to three weeks: “Thats why we need to be on guard.”
Sense of urgency
Having thousands Read More – Source
