Issued on: 15/05/2020 – 18:55Modified: 15/05/2020 – 18:55
Britain and the European Union both demanded that the other side give ground in talks on a new post-Brexit trade deal or risk severe damage in tetchy exchanges after the latest bout of bargaining ended with scant progress on Friday.
Advertising
Read more
The United Kingdom left the EU on Jan. 31 but the main terms of its membership remain in place for a transition period until the end of this year, giving it time to negotiate a new free trade deal with the bloc.
Failure to reach a deal would convulse global trade just as the world aims to exit the coronavirus lockdown. But so far the talks have not gone well — and that was the only thing on which both sides agreed on Friday.
"We made very little progress towards agreement on the most significant outstanding issues between us," UK chief negotiator David Frost said after a third week-long round of talks.
The main sticking point has been so-called "level playing field" rules to ensure fair competition. The EU says they are indispensible to ensure Britain does not undercut its standards, but which Britain rejects as binding it to European laws.
"As soon as the EU recognises that we will not conclude an agreement on that basis, we will be able to make progress," Frost said. "We very much need a change in EU approach for the next round beginning on 1 June."
EU chief negotiator Michel Barnier fired back by saying the talks have been "very disappointing" and heading for a stalemate unless London changed tack.
"There will be no agreement with the UK without a balanced agreement on fisheries and a proper, balanced agreement on level playing field," Barnier told a news conference, adding he was determined to get a deal but no longer optimistic it was coming.
"We will not bargain away our values for the benefit of the British economy," he said.
He accused London of trying to pick and chose the tastiest morsels of the EU's single market but rejecting conditions for access all the 27 member states honour.
Sterling weakened on Friday as Brussels and London dug their heels in ahead of a key deadline at the end of June.
Both sides are then due to assess progress so far in talked aimed at agreeing trade deal with no tarifss or quotas on any goods, and agree on whether to extend the talks, which London has refused to do.
A senior British official said London proposed exploring no tariffs or quotas on 98-99% of goods instead. The EU said honing the detail of such an arrangement would take years and the bloc would still demand level playing field guarantees.
Brexit no deal?
After years of Brexit political chaos in London, investors and companies are trying to work out if London and Brussels are simply ratchetting up the rhetoric or are so far apart that there could be a cliff-edge at the end of 2020.
Time is ticking and the EU has a strict timetable, further complicated by the coronavirus pandemic, which has sapped resources and political attention on both sides of the English Channel, as well as complicating the Brexit talks dependant on intense horse-trading done face-to-face, rather than virtually.
Issued on: 15/05/2020 – 18:55Modified: 15/05/2020 – 18:55
Britain and the European Union both demanded that the other side give ground in talks on a new post-Brexit trade deal or risk severe damage in tetchy exchanges after the latest bout of bargaining ended with scant progress on Friday.
Advertising
Read more
The United Kingdom left the EU on Jan. 31 but the main terms of its membership remain in place for a transition period until the end of this year, giving it time to negotiate a new free trade deal with the bloc.
Failure to reach a deal would convulse global trade just as the world aims to exit the coronavirus lockdown. But so far the talks have not gone well — and that was the only thing on which both sides agreed on Friday.
"We made very little progress towards agreement on the most significant outstanding issues between us," UK chief negotiator David Frost said after a third week-long round of talks.
The main sticking point has been so-called "level playing field" rules to ensure fair competition. The EU says they are indispensible to ensure Britain does not undercut its standards, but which Britain rejects as binding it to European laws.
"As soon as the EU recognises that we will not conclude an agreement on that basis, we will be able to make progress," Frost said. "We very much need a change in EU approach for the next round beginning on 1 June."
EU chief negotiator Michel Barnier fired back by saying the talks have been "very disappointing" and heading for a stalemate unless London changed tack.
"There will be no agreement with the UK without a balanced agreement on fisheries and a proper, balanced agreement on level playing field," Barnier told a news conference, adding he was determined to get a deal but no longer optimistic it was coming.
"We will not bargain away our values for the benefit of the British economy," he said.
He accused London of trying to pick and chose the tastiest morsels of the EU's single market but rejecting conditions for access all the 27 member states honour.
Sterling weakened on Friday as Brussels and London dug their heels in ahead of a key deadline at the end of June.
Both sides are then due to assess progress so far in talked aimed at agreeing trade deal with no tarifss or quotas on any goods, and agree on whether to extend the talks, which London has refused to do.
A senior British official said London proposed exploring no tariffs or quotas on 98-99% of goods instead. The EU said honing the detail of such an arrangement would take years and the bloc would still demand level playing field guarantees.
Brexit no deal?
After years of Brexit political chaos in London, investors and companies are trying to work out if London and Brussels are simply ratchetting up the rhetoric or are so far apart that there could be a cliff-edge at the end of 2020.
Time is ticking and the EU has a strict timetable, further complicated by the coronavirus pandemic, which has sapped resources and political attention on both sides of the English Channel, as well as complicating the Brexit talks dependant on intense horse-trading done face-to-face, rather than virtually.
