Monday, June 2, 2025
Germany Latest News
  • Sports
  • USA
  • Asia
  • Health
  • Life Style
  • Tech
  • Science
  • Latin America
  • Africa
  • Europe
No Result
View All Result
Germany Latest News

Facebook wants to give people more control over political ads. Thats a mistake.

by The Editor
January 13, 2020
in Tech
0
Facebook wants to give people more control over political ads. Thats a mistake.

Digital Politics is a column about the global intersection of technology and the world of politics.

Facebooks latest solution to stop divisive political content from distorting democracy is as simple as it is wrongheaded: Let the people decide.

In a series of upgrades to be rolled out over the next six months, the worlds largest social network is giving its users a greater say over how theyre targeted with political ads on the companys global platforms.

People will be able to opt out of viewing paid-for messages. Facebooks transparency tools will be expanded. Researchers will have more power to track digital campaigns.

Facebook also doubled down on its refusal to fact-check political messages from established politicians (even when they made false claims), and said it would continue to allow partisan groups to target people online with direct messages — a tactic that Google had banned on its rival services worldwide.

As a U.S. tech giant, appealing to notions of free speech and individual responsibility makes sense — theyre baked into the countrys constitution. But the First Amendment — or the tenets of freedom of speech — does not apply in the same way beyond U.S. borders, where even Western democracies tend to put caveats on the extent of free speech, namely during election seasons.

The tech giants raison dêtre remains one where users, not the company, make the final call.

It also fails to address a level of quasi-state paternalism that people in other countries, notably in government-heavy Europe and across Asia, have come to rely on when tackling some of the most difficult questions now facing voters in the 21st century.

When it comes to asking users from San Francisco to Stockholm to Seoul to make their own determination about what content shows up in their feeds, Facebooks new strategy is based on a basic fundamental flaw — that users have the time, willingness or ability to do so on their own.

Thats wishful thinking.

By outsourcing the policing of political messages to regular people on both its social network and Instagram, the photo-sharing service also owned by Facebook, the tech giant is again sidestepping its obligations for taking greater responsibility for what is posted on its social networks.

Its also deputizing its more than 2.4 billion global users in a complex, ever-changing battle against misinformation and overtly-partisan material that no one is capable of fighting on his or her own — particularly average internet users who are more accustomed to swiping through photos from family and friends than checking if a social media post may have come from a Russian-backed group looking to sow dissent.

What Facebooks latest steps will lead to is more of the same.

On paper, people will be granted new powers to track and limit who targets them with political ads.

But in reality, few, if any, will take advantage of such powers to change their social media experience by limiting, or even deleting, all forms of paid-for partisan messaging ahead of this years U.S. presidential election or the litany of other national votes planned in 2020 from Poland to Peru.

Woods from the trees

Its not that individuals should not do more to protect themselves online.

Since the 2016 U.S. presidential election, after which the countrys national security agencies alleged that Kremlin-backed groups tried to sway voters, peoples awareness of such tactics — and ability to combat them through new transparency tools from Google, Facebook and Twitter aimed at highlighting whos buying online ads — has grown steadily.

But relying on Facebook users to do the heavy lifting wont address some of the systemic problems that have allowed social media platforms to become rich breeding grounds for conspiracy theories, outright hate speech and other politically motivated divisive content.

The real questions are how such material is created in the first place, who is behind campaigns to spread it virally online, and what can be done to suppress the worst offenders — all topics that would require Facebook, not individual users, to step into the breach and take greater responsibility for what is published online.

In the companys defense, it has invested millions in new technologies to weed out some harmful material, hired (mostly contract) workers to moderate digital content and beefed up its security checks in an effort to keep foreign governments at bay.

Yet the tech giants raison dêtre remains one where users, not the company, make the final call. Thats a game plan Facebook has already used to sidestep greater regulatory scrutiny.

Facebook CEO Mark Zuckerberg | Win McNamee/Getty Images

Take its new plan to allow people to opt out to see fewer (but still some) political ads and to remove themselves from so-called custom audiences, or bespoke lists created by advertisers looking to target voters with similar characteristics.

The company took a similar stance when addressing the barrage of privacy-related hackles in the aftermath of the Cambridge Analytica scandal in which more than 87 million people

politico

Related posts

What Are the Pros and Cons of Sperm Freezing Technology?

What Are the Pros and Cons of Sperm Freezing Technology?

September 8, 2023
How Tech Partnerships Can Keep the E-Commerce Boom Going?

How Tech Partnerships Can Keep the E-Commerce Boom Going?

September 8, 2023

Digital Politics is a column about the global intersection of technology and the world of politics.

Facebooks latest solution to stop divisive political content from distorting democracy is as simple as it is wrongheaded: Let the people decide.

In a series of upgrades to be rolled out over the next six months, the worlds largest social network is giving its users a greater say over how theyre targeted with political ads on the companys global platforms.

People will be able to opt out of viewing paid-for messages. Facebooks transparency tools will be expanded. Researchers will have more power to track digital campaigns.

Facebook also doubled down on its refusal to fact-check political messages from established politicians (even when they made false claims), and said it would continue to allow partisan groups to target people online with direct messages — a tactic that Google had banned on its rival services worldwide.

As a U.S. tech giant, appealing to notions of free speech and individual responsibility makes sense — theyre baked into the countrys constitution. But the First Amendment — or the tenets of freedom of speech — does not apply in the same way beyond U.S. borders, where even Western democracies tend to put caveats on the extent of free speech, namely during election seasons.

The tech giants raison dêtre remains one where users, not the company, make the final call.

It also fails to address a level of quasi-state paternalism that people in other countries, notably in government-heavy Europe and across Asia, have come to rely on when tackling some of the most difficult questions now facing voters in the 21st century.

When it comes to asking users from San Francisco to Stockholm to Seoul to make their own determination about what content shows up in their feeds, Facebooks new strategy is based on a basic fundamental flaw — that users have the time, willingness or ability to do so on their own.

Thats wishful thinking.

By outsourcing the policing of political messages to regular people on both its social network and Instagram, the photo-sharing service also owned by Facebook, the tech giant is again sidestepping its obligations for taking greater responsibility for what is posted on its social networks.

Its also deputizing its more than 2.4 billion global users in a complex, ever-changing battle against misinformation and overtly-partisan material that no one is capable of fighting on his or her own — particularly average internet users who are more accustomed to swiping through photos from family and friends than checking if a social media post may have come from a Russian-backed group looking to sow dissent.

What Facebooks latest steps will lead to is more of the same.

On paper, people will be granted new powers to track and limit who targets them with political ads.

But in reality, few, if any, will take advantage of such powers to change their social media experience by limiting, or even deleting, all forms of paid-for partisan messaging ahead of this years U.S. presidential election or the litany of other national votes planned in 2020 from Poland to Peru.

Woods from the trees

Its not that individuals should not do more to protect themselves online.

Since the 2016 U.S. presidential election, after which the countrys national security agencies alleged that Kremlin-backed groups tried to sway voters, peoples awareness of such tactics — and ability to combat them through new transparency tools from Google, Facebook and Twitter aimed at highlighting whos buying online ads — has grown steadily.

But relying on Facebook users to do the heavy lifting wont address some of the systemic problems that have allowed social media platforms to become rich breeding grounds for conspiracy theories, outright hate speech and other politically motivated divisive content.

The real questions are how such material is created in the first place, who is behind campaigns to spread it virally online, and what can be done to suppress the worst offenders — all topics that would require Facebook, not individual users, to step into the breach and take greater responsibility for what is published online.

In the companys defense, it has invested millions in new technologies to weed out some harmful material, hired (mostly contract) workers to moderate digital content and beefed up its security checks in an effort to keep foreign governments at bay.

Yet the tech giants raison dêtre remains one where users, not the company, make the final call. Thats a game plan Facebook has already used to sidestep greater regulatory scrutiny.

Facebook CEO Mark Zuckerberg | Win McNamee/Getty Images

Take its new plan to allow people to opt out to see fewer (but still some) political ads and to remove themselves from so-called custom audiences, or bespoke lists created by advertisers looking to target voters with similar characteristics.

The company took a similar stance when addressing the barrage of privacy-related hackles in the aftermath of the Cambridge Analytica scandal in which more than 87 million people

politico

Previous Post

Chronicle of a nine-month offensive to seize Libya’s capital

Next Post

Legendary NFL coaches Bill Cowher and Jimmy Johnson found out on live TV they were elected to the Pro Football Hall of Fame

Next Post
Legendary NFL coaches Bill Cowher and Jimmy Johnson found out on live TV they were elected to the Pro Football Hall of Fame

Legendary NFL coaches Bill Cowher and Jimmy Johnson found out on live TV they were elected to the Pro Football Hall of Fame

RECOMMENDED NEWS

Tulsa teachers marched 7 days across state to confront Oklahoma lawmakers

Tulsa teachers marched 7 days across state to confront Oklahoma lawmakers

7 years ago
Queen agrees on ‘period of transition’ for Harry and Meghan

Queen agrees on ‘period of transition’ for Harry and Meghan

5 years ago
Christmas sandwiches, our newest Yuletide tradition

Christmas sandwiches, our newest Yuletide tradition

8 years ago
Holland, 3 relievers pitch Giants past Rangers 3-1

Holland, 3 relievers pitch Giants past Rangers 3-1

7 years ago

FOLLOW US

  • 139 Followers
  • 87.2k Followers
  • 202k Subscribers

BROWSE BY CATEGORIES

  • 1xbet Casino Russia
  • 1xbet Russian Top
  • Africa
  • AI
  • Asia
  • Europe
  • Health
  • latest news
  • Latin America
  • Life Style
  • Mail Order Brides
  • Mostbet
  • Online dating
  • onlyfans
  • Pin Up
  • Pin Up Russia
  • Science
  • Sports
  • Tech
  • Uncategorized
  • USA

BROWSE BY TOPICS

2018 League Bali United Beijing BlackBerry Brazil Broja Budget Travel Bundesliga California Champions League Chelsea China Chopper Bike Coronavirus COVID COVID-19 Crime Doctor Terawan EU France French German Istana Negara Italy Kazakhstan Market Stories Mexico National Exam Nigeria Omicron Pakistan Police protests Qatar Ronaldo Russia Smart Voting Sweden TikTok Trump UK Ukraine US vaccine Visit Bali
No Result
View All Result

Recent Posts

  • AI Girlfriends as Creative Writing Partners
  • OnlyFans Platform Analysis
  • How to Day German Fashion
  • Southeast Continental Capabilities
  • What is a Mail Order Wife?

Categories

  • 1xbet Casino Russia
  • 1xbet Russian Top
  • Africa
  • AI
  • Asia
  • Europe
  • Health
  • latest news
  • Latin America
  • Life Style
  • Mail Order Brides
  • Mostbet
  • Online dating
  • onlyfans
  • Pin Up
  • Pin Up Russia
  • Science
  • Sports
  • Tech
  • Uncategorized
  • USA

Tags

2018 League Bali United Beijing BlackBerry Brazil Broja Budget Travel Bundesliga California Champions League Chelsea China Chopper Bike Coronavirus COVID COVID-19 Crime Doctor Terawan EU France French German Istana Negara Italy Kazakhstan Market Stories Mexico National Exam Nigeria Omicron Pakistan Police protests Qatar Ronaldo Russia Smart Voting Sweden TikTok Trump UK Ukraine US vaccine Visit Bali
Federal Government focuses on “integrated security”
latest news

Federal Government focuses on “integrated security”

by The Editor
June 14, 2023
0

Berlin (dpa) – The Federal Government is responding to the challenges of an increasingly unstable world order by means of a “policy...

Read more

Recent News

  • AI Girlfriends as Creative Writing Partners
  • OnlyFans Platform Analysis
  • How to Day German Fashion

Category

  • 1xbet Casino Russia
  • 1xbet Russian Top
  • Africa
  • AI
  • Asia
  • Europe
  • Health
  • latest news
  • Latin America
  • Life Style
  • Mail Order Brides
  • Mostbet
  • Online dating
  • onlyfans
  • Pin Up
  • Pin Up Russia
  • Science
  • Sports
  • Tech
  • Uncategorized
  • USA

Recent News

AI Girlfriends as Creative Writing Partners

May 30, 2025

OnlyFans Platform Analysis

June 12, 2024
  • About
  • Advertise
  • Careers
  • Contact

© 2025 JNews - Premium WordPress news & magazine theme by Jegtheme.

No Result
View All Result
  • Sports
  • USA
  • Asia
  • Health
  • Life Style
  • Tech
  • Science
  • Latin America
  • Africa
  • Europe

© 2025 JNews - Premium WordPress news & magazine theme by Jegtheme.