Russia's move drew harsh criticism from US Ambassador Nikki Haley, who said Russia had struck a "deep blow" to UN efforts to identify those using chemical weapons and deter future attacks.France, which voted in favor of renewing the mandate for the Joint Investigative Mechanism (JIM), also expressed alarm."It promises great difficulties for the future," French Ambassador François Delattre told the council.In April, more than 80 people were killed in a sarin attack on the rebel-held town of Khan Sheikhoun — an attack that prompted the United States to launch 59 Tomahawk cruise missiles at a Syrian airbase.A joint report from the United Nations and international chemical weapons inspectors last month determined the Syrian regime of Bashar al-Assad was responsible for the attack.Syria has repeatedly denied it had anything to do with the attack and denies it has any chemical weapons. Damascus has said an airstrike hit a chemical weapons depot in the rebel-held area.Thursday's resolution received 11 votes in favor and two against, with two abstentions. But because one of the votes against it was from a permanent council member — Russia — the resolution failed to pass.It was the 10th time Russia, a key Syrian ally, has vetoed a UN draft resolution on Syria since the civil war began there in 2011.The move means that the JIM's mandate expires at midnight Thursday, rather than be extended for another year.The UN Security Council meets Friday behind closed doors to consider a compromise resolution regarding the fate of the international inspection system for chemical weapons in Syria. Council member Japan has submitted a new resolution for consideration. It includes various proposals to keep the mandate of chemical weapons probers alive following the Russian veto of the US resolution designed to extend the existence of the investigation. A vote is expected in the late afternoon.
Nebenzia said Russia's issue was not with the work of the investigators, but with their mandate. Russia vetoed an October resolution to extend the mandate, saying the group is prejudiced against Russia, and on Thursday the ambassador again cited "flaws" with the investigators' work."There was nothing balanced in the US draft resolution. There was nothing balanced there," Nebenzia told the council.Russia put forward its own resolution on extending the mandate, but it was rejected after receiving only three votes in favor.Haley tweeted after the vote that "by using the veto to kill a mechanism in Syria that holds users of chemical weapons accountable, Russia proves they cannot be trusted or credible as we work towards a political solution in Syria."Before Thursday's meeting, Haley told reporters US officials had tried to call the Russian mission to discuss renewing the mandate, but the mission's phones weren't working. She said she tried to call Russian Ambassador Vassily Nebenzia, but "for some reason he's not available."Friday, Russian Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov said "no such efforts were rejected.""Seems we are witnessing a new phenomenon in international relations, as now, apart from fake news, there is also fake diplomacy," Lavrov said from Moscow.The foreign minister said Russia clarified its stance on the mandate extension but "the Americans tried to use some cosmetic phrases, pretending that they had taken our concerns into consideration."US President Donald Trump had urged all Security Council members to renew the mandate to ensure that Assad's regime "does not commit mass murder with chemical weapons ever again."As part of their work, UK Ambassador Matthew Rycroft said before the vote, the JIM investigators had looked into "the frankly ridiculous conspiracy theories that some were coming up with to explain away the use of chemical weapons in Syria by the Assad regime."Rycroft said after the veto that Russia has "failed as a supposed supporter of peace in Syria," but Nebenzia disagreed."It would seem that we are united on one goal — to extend the mandate of the mechanism and to boost its effectiveness to identify the true perpetrators in chemical weapons crimes," he said. "However, it turned out that some of our partners at the UN Security Council were guided by other priorities."Nebenzia urged more discussion on the issue of weapons of mass destruction, saying "delays in this matter are liable to carry a very high price."
CNN's Eric Levenson and Sara Ganim contributed to this report.Let's